October 14, 2009
Darwin was most probably right in his evolutional theory and the creation of mankind. We are biological animals and the evolutional process is clear to see. This however does not prove or explain away GOD, or the possibility or indeed the over whelming probability that consciousness/sole exists.
Humans are different distinct from the rest of the animal kingdom here is where Darwin stops and can offer no further insights and Religion/philosophy picks up and attempts to explain or search for our meaning. The sole could have existed before humans and our biological evolution and we will continue to exist in an ever expanding push through this dimension. We are not our thoughts, ideas, or experiences. Our bodies are just biological computers that last for 70 or 80 years, some time less. We are much older than that. Heaven is real, just not forever and it’s a choice. One state does not discount many others. I look at it as the afterlife of heaven in the Biblical and other books sense could be an invitation to hang out with God. The alternative doses not neccerialy mean an absence of God but rather a multitude of dimensions. All have the opportunity to contact the source or God and exist in other forms. If one wants to use logic if indeed Logic can be applied then God has to be bigger and exponentially more complex than simple duality’s. One Heaven or One Hell.
Again not one or Two, but rather Three, Four, Five, six ect
So Christianity, Islam, Buddhism and others are just as correct as any other idea that talks of continuation after death. A just different translation FROM the same, Source, sometimes a little gets lost in translation. Of course we also have to factor in mans attempt to corrupt, impose and mislead.
I make no claim this is fact, or channeled from any higher source or dimension, but an idea that popped into my head last night that I felt compelled to Hurley write down before I forgot. This perhaps will explain why it may not make any sense. But it does to me. : )
October 14, 2009
|Wednesday, 14 October 2009|
Blair is a War Criminal, Bereaved Parents Tell Inquiry
‘Tony Blair should be charged with war crimes for ordering British troops to invade Iraq, families of servicemen killed in the conflict told the official inquiry into the campaign yesterday. The former senior civil servant heading the inquiry and his panel were confronted by an angry group after inviting bereaved relatives to give their views. They were unanimous in condemning the war as illegal.’
UK Government Tries to Demonise Home Schooling
‘Children educated at home are twice as likely to be known by social services and four times more likely as young adults to be out of work, education or training than those who go to school, MPs have been told.
MPs on the cross-party select committee for children, schools and families asked the head of a government inquiry into home education and the schools minister to defend calls for tougher rules on parents who teach their children at home.
September 23, 2009
Colonel Muammar Gaddafi today attacked the United Nations, branding the Security Council the “terror council”. The Libyan leader was addressing the UN in New York as those affected by terrorist attacks protested at his presence outside. Colonel Gaddafi lambasted the UN’s “inequality” and inability to prevent some 65 wars breaking out since being founded in 1945. His words came as relatives of victims of the Lockerbie bombing gathered on the roads leading to the UN compound to demonstrate against his appearance in front of the general assembly.
They were joined by those affected by the September 11 attacks in New York and family members of victims of IRA violence in the North. As they united in their condemnation of Gaddafi, the man himself used the opportunity of speaking to world leaders to hit out at the UN’s structure.
He said Libya did not accept, acknowledge or recognise the UN charter and criticised the make-up of the Security Council. Dressed in brown robes with a large black badge of Africa attached, Gaddafi read from hand-written notes contained in a yellow folder. He called for an abolition of veto rights for the permanent council members. “It should not be called the Security Council, it should be called the ’terror council’,” he said. Gaddafi added that the body should be more representative with a place on the council for African nations.
He also attacked the UN’s inability to prevent conflict, noting that since 1945 “sixty-five aggressive wars took place without any collective action by the United Nations to prevent them”. Gaddafi’s speech directly followed that of President Barack Obama. The Libyan leader welcomed the US leader’s address, adding that he was “a glimpse in the dark”. He contrasted it to the actions of the previous US administration, calling on the Bush administration to be held to account over the Iraq war.
He said that “those who have participated in mass murder against Iraqis” should be tried. Gaddafi added that the US will never come to a “fruitful” result in terms of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Gaddafi’s long – it lasted for around one and a half hours – and at times rambling speech took in a number of topics, from the effects of jet lag to swine flu and even the assassination of John F Kennedy, but it was delivered in front of a half-empty chamber. The US was represented by two low to mid-ranking diplomats, with secretary of state Hillary Clinton leaving the hall after President Obama’s address.
Likewise British foreign secretary David Miliband left the chamber shortly before the Libyan leader’s speech, a spokeswoman for the UK mission the UN confirmed.
Greg Dyke in BBC ‘Conspiracy’ Claim”I fear it will never happen because I fear the political class will stop it”.’
September 22, 2009
Greg Dyke in BBC ‘Conspiracy’ Claim
‘The BBC is part of a “conspiracy” preventing the “radical changes” needed to UK democracy, the corporation’s former director general has said. Greg Dyke told a Lib Dem conference meeting he wanted a commission to look into the “whole political system”. But he said: “I fear it will never happen because I fear the political class will stop it”.’
Big Pharma Pushing Virus Theory for Blood Pressure: Thinly-Veiled Attempt to Push ‘Blood Pressure Vaccine’
‘A new study suggesting that a common virus might play a role in hypertension has some suggesting that a vaccine might be developed against high blood pressure. Researchers from Harvard Medical School found in laboratory studies that the herpes variant cytomegalovirus (CMV), carried in the body of 60 to 99 percent of people worldwide, increases blood vessel inflammation and causes high blood pressure in mice. “Some cases of hypertension might be treated or prevented by antiviral therapy or a vaccine against CMV,” researcher Clyde Crumpacker said.’
International Monetary Fund to Sell Over 403 Tons of Gold to Depress Gold Prices and Boost Stocks
‘The International Monetary Fund said its executive board endorsed the sale of 403 tons of gold, worth an estimated 13 billion dollars, to boost its lending capacity to poor countries.
Monday, 21 September 2009
Paralysed Cancer Vaccine Girl to be Put on At-Risk Register ‘To Shut Her Up’
‘A mother who is planning legal action against a pharmaceutical giant – claiming her daughter was left partially paralysed after having an anti-cancer vaccine – has been told the teenager is to be put on the social services ‘at-risk’ register.
Cheryl Cave says allegations that she is abusing her 13-year-old daughter Ashleigh are an attempt to ‘shut her up’ as she is demanding an investigation into the safety of a drug used to protect girls against the HPV virus that causes cervical cancer. Ashleigh collapsed shortly after being given the jab at school and has spent nearly a year in hospital.
Big Pharma Fabricates ‘Female Sexual Dysfunction’ to Sell More Drugs
‘Female sexual dysfunction was wholly created by drug companies hoping to make even bigger money off women than they have off men.’
‘The European Union is developing a 21st century panopticon, a beast surveillance system that critics describe as “Orwellian,” “sinister,” and “positively chilling,” that would collate data from numerous sources, including surveillance cameras and personal computers, in order to detect “abnormal behavior” across the entire continent.
In a broader sense, this is part of the move towards creating a pan-European federal police force, where information and powers are shared as part of a centralized system. It is also a giant step towards the creation of a European CIA tasked not with keeping tabs on foreign enemies, but spying on its own population.
September 3, 2009
Listen , Think, Then Do!
We are living in what the Greeks called the right time for a “metamorphosis of the gods,” i.e. of the fundamental principles and symbols. This peculiarity of our time, which is certainly not of our conscious choosing, is the expression of the unconscious man within us who is changing.
Coming generations will have to take account of this momentous transformation if humanity is not to destroy itself through the might of its own technology and science.
September 2, 2009
Phasing Out 100W Lightbulbs ‘Could Damage Health of Britons’
Yes, and that’s the idea
‘The Government is putting its green credentials ahead of the health of Britons as old-fashioned and 100W lightbulbs are phased out under EU rules which come into force this week, campaigners said.’
Beyond Space and Time: Fractals, Hyperspace and More
‘We don’t have any trouble coping with three dimensions – or four at a pinch. The 3D world of solid objects and limitless space is something we accept with scarcely a second thought. Time, the fourth dimension, gets a little trickier. But it’s when we start to explore worlds that embody more – or indeed fewer – dimensions that things get really tough.’
Supermarkets in ‘Secret Talks to Introduce GM Foods to the Shelves’
‘The big supermarkets have held secret talks to pave the way for the introduction of controversial GM crops on to their shelves, industry sources said last night. The stores banned GM ingredients more than ten years ago in response to public anxiety about their impact on human health and the environment. But a source indicated that all the major supermarkets were involved in the discussions except Waitrose.’
Goldman Sachs Execs Blame Anti-Semitism ‘People inside Goldman tell me that some senior executives say they believe the onslaught of negative stories detailing Goldman’s manifold ties to upper levels of government, charges that it somehow fraudulently profited from the subprime crisis, and now the press about the firm’s record earnings is so out of proportion to reality that the coverage contains an element of anti-Semitism—subtly playing off the racist myth of a conspiracy of Jewish bankers controlling the world for their own benefit.’
Rothschild Zionist Miliband Tries to Supress Evidence of Illegal UK Arms Sales to Blacklisted Countries
‘Britain has launched an urgent investigation into allegations that UK arms dealers have been buying up old Soviet weapons and selling them on to blacklisted countries.
In a sign of acute government sensitivity over the allegations, the foreign secretary David Miliband has asked senior MPs on a Commons select committee to suppress evidence of the arms sales. Miliband intervened after a group of MPs were handed a document detailing the arms sales by the deputy foreign minister in the former Soviet republic of Ukraine.’
August 19, 2009
Immigrants at risk of abusing rules will be first to get controversial ID cards ahead of national roll-out- tHEY CLAIM THIS BUT HOW LONG WILL IT BE UNTILL WE ALL ARE TOLD WE NEED THEM.
The home secretary, Jacqui Smith, today unveiled the first identity cards to be issued as part of the government’s controversial national scheme.
The biometric card will be issued from November, initially to non-EU students and marriage visa holders.
The credit-card-sized document will show the holder’s photograph, name, date of birth, nationality and immigration status.
A secure electronic chip will also hold their biometric details, including fingerprints and a digital facial image.
Smith said that the cards would allow people to “easily and securely prove their identity”.
“We want to be able to prevent those here illegally from benefiting from the privileges of Britain,” she said.
Compulsory identity cards for foreign nationals will kick-start the national identity scheme, with the first applicants having to apply for cards from November 25.
Within three years all foreign nationals applying for leave to enter or remain in the UK will be required to have a card, with around nine in ten foreign nationals in Britain covered by the scheme by 2014-15, Smith said.
The UK Border Agency will begin issuing the biometric cards to the two categories of foreign nationals who officials say are most at risk of abusing immigration rules – students and those on a marriage or civil partnership visa.
Both types of migrants will be told they must have the new card when they ask to extend their stay in the country.
The home secretary said that employers and colleges wanted to be confident people were who they said they were, while immigration and police officers wanted to verify identity and detect abuse.
“We all want to see our borders more secure, and human trafficking, organised immigration crime, illegal working and benefit fraud tackled. ID cards for foreign nationals, in locking people to one identity, will deliver in all these areas,” the home secretary said.
The Conservatives say they support modern biometric cards for immigrants – but they say a national identity register remains unworkable.
Phil Booth, head of the national No2ID campaign group, attacked the roll-out of the cards as a “softening-up exercise”.
“The Home Office is trying to salami-slice the population to get this scheme going in any way they can,” he told the BBC.
“Once they get some people to take the card it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
“The volume of foreign nationals involved is minuscule so it won’t do anything to tackle illegal immigration. They’ve basically picked on a group of people who have no possibility of objecting to the card – they either comply or they are out.”
The government will start to issue cards to British and foreign nationals within the European economic area who work in sensitive roles or locations from next year, starting with airport workers.
From 2010, the government will target young people to get an identity card on a voluntary basis “to assist them in proving their identity as they start their independent life in society”, with full roll-out to all British citizens starting from 2011.
The Conservatives have vowed to scrap the ID scheme if they form the next government.
The shadow home secretary, Dominic Grieve, said that ID cards were an “expensive white elephant”.
“Whilst we support strengthening biometric technology for use in visas and passports, this should not be used as cover to introduce the identity card scheme by stealth,” he said.
“The government are kidding themselves if they think ID cards for foreign nationals will protect against illegal immigration or terrorism – since they don’t apply to those coming here for less than three months.
“ID cards are an expensive white elephant that risk making us less – not more – safe. It is high time the government scrapped this ill-fated project.”
The Liberal Democrats said the cards’ “fancy design” did not detract from the fact that they remained an intrusion into people’s liberty.
Chris Huhne, the party’s home affairs spokesman, said: “It does not matter how fancy the design of ID cards is, they remain a grotesque intrusion on the liberty of the British people.
“The government is using vulnerable members of our society, like foreign nationals who do not have the vote, as guinea pigs for a deeply unpopular and unworkable policy. When voting adults are forced to carry ID cards, this scheme will prove to be a laminated poll tax.”
We must never let these ID cards spread in use or acceptance by British people.
August 18, 2009
Say NO when things don’t feel right. You say NO when the government is not the servant, but now the master. Say it enough, and the word begins to empower you, and build you into a new improved person.
After coming across the above message I wanted to write a small piece about it and what I think it means to us all. If we as a population of both the planet and the your own particular country said NO, to swine Flu vaccine, if you said NO, to paying your taxes, If you said NO, to invading another country based on a lie, then what Power do the Power elite really have.
If the Police men and women in this country said we aren’t going to harass law abiding citizens who happened to be filming the houses of Parliament or some other now sensitive place in London. If more people said No, to laws that take power away instead of defending any one, then we would really be able to make a change. I think it’s now time to do just that but to go from a place of saying YES, all the time to NO, dose depend on CHANGE.
So here is the first step of change that we all need, the first steps is say NO, after we get used to saying that a little more we then must change how we view ourselves and the world.